News

Supreme Court: Magistrate Can’t Decide on Protest Against Their Own Decision to Take Action

In a recent judicial pronouncement, the Supreme Court authoritatively declared that a Judicial Magistrate lacks the jurisdiction to adjudicate a protest petition impugning their own cognizance order predicated on a final report. The factual matrix of this adjudication revolves around a Chief Judicial Magistrate who, subsequent to the receipt of a final report from the […]

Supreme Court: Magistrate Can’t Decide on Protest Against Their Own Decision to Take Action Read More »

Supreme Court Says Judges Should Use ‘Rajnesh v. Neha’ Rules for Maintenance

On the 6th of November 2023, the Supreme Court, in light of observed noncompliance with maintenance directives as articulated in the precedent of Rajnesh v. Neha and Another (2021) 2 SCC 32, particularly within the realm of matrimonial litigation, promulgated a directive. The apex court mandated the widespread dissemination of the comprehensive guidelines enunciated in

Supreme Court Says Judges Should Use ‘Rajnesh v. Neha’ Rules for Maintenance Read More »

Inheritance Claim of Son’s Widow Denied per HSA Sections 15 & 16

The declarative stance articulated by the Supreme Court elucidates that, in accordance with the stipulations set forth in Sections 15 and 16 of the Hindu Succession Act (HSA), the widow of a deceased son does not inherently accrue an immediate entitlement to assert a proprietary interest in the joint family property earmarked for the mother-in-law.

Inheritance Claim of Son’s Widow Denied per HSA Sections 15 & 16 Read More »

Supreme Court Allows Section 65B Certificates Throughout Trial

The Supreme Court made it clear that Section 65-B certificates are allowed at any time during a trial under the Indian Evidence Act. This was emphasized during the Bangalore bomb blasts case, where the Court talked about the importance of fairness in criminal trials. They stressed that being impartial is crucial for justice. The Court

Supreme Court Allows Section 65B Certificates Throughout Trial Read More »

Delhi High Court Seeks Supreme Court’s Help with Irretrievable Breakdown Divorces

The Delhi High Court has unambiguously affirmed that the exclusive jurisdiction to grant divorces predicated on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown of a marriage is vested in the Supreme Court, in accordance with the provisions of Article 142 of the Indian Constitution. In a pertinent legal matter wherein the spouse, acting as the appellant, contested

Delhi High Court Seeks Supreme Court’s Help with Irretrievable Breakdown Divorces Read More »

Delhi Court Advocates Mandatory Prenuptial Agreements for No-Fault Divorces

The Court stressed that refusal to grant divorce would force parties to suffer further and would amount to “law-induced mental cruelty.” In a recent legal judgment, a Delhi court has advocated the compulsory incorporation of prenuptial agreements as a prerequisite for matrimonial unions. The primary objective of this recommendation is to ameliorate the emotional distress

Delhi Court Advocates Mandatory Prenuptial Agreements for No-Fault Divorces Read More »

Delhi High Court Revaluates Paternity Assumption Through DNA Test under Section 112 of Evidence Act

Section 112 of the Evidence Act underscores the principle that children born within the confines of a legally recognized marriage are deemed legitimate per se and it ensures that no unwarranted assumptions of impropriety or moral transgressions are made and instead places the burden of proof on those who contest the child’s legitimacy. In the

Delhi High Court Revaluates Paternity Assumption Through DNA Test under Section 112 of Evidence Act Read More »

Delhi Court Sanctions Contested Mutual Divorce, Advocates Mandatory Prenuptial Agreements

In a noteworthy legal development, a Delhi Court has decreed a mutual divorce under the provisions of Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, notwithstanding the sustained and vigorous opposition exhibited by the wife towards her husband\’s divorce petition, which extended over a period of seven years. This distinctive case, characterized by the conspicuous absence

Delhi Court Sanctions Contested Mutual Divorce, Advocates Mandatory Prenuptial Agreements Read More »

Supreme Court Affirms Your Right to Marry Your Loved One Despite Family Disagreements

\”The right of the petitioners to marry a person of their own choice is indelible and protected under the Constitution, which cannot be diluted in any manner whatsoever,\” the court said. In a recent legal decision, the Delhi High Court emphasized that your constitutional right to marry the person you choose remains strong and unchanging,

Supreme Court Affirms Your Right to Marry Your Loved One Despite Family Disagreements Read More »

Second Marriages with Living Spouse Invalid, Consent Doesn’t Matter

A recent decision from the Delhi High Court states that, according to the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, you can\’t have a second marriage if your ex-spouse or you are still alive, even if you both agree. This ruling was made by a group of judges, including Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna.

Second Marriages with Living Spouse Invalid, Consent Doesn’t Matter Read More »

Chat With Divorce Lawyer